|
Neuroimaging can provide useful information for the evaluation and
monitoring of patients with
movement disorders. The distribution of trace paramagnetic substances –
particularly iron – with the extrapyramidal system can be accurately
assessed with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Abnormalities of iron
distribution can provide keys to aid in differential diagnosis. Neuroimaging
also plays an important role in excluding other central nervous system
pathology, which may mimic the more common causes of movement disorders.
Introduction. Neuroimaging has always played an important role in the
diagnosis and management of patients with movement disorders. Despite the
heterogeneous neuropathic features of movement disorders, imaging the
anatomic and functional characteristics remains an important clinical tool.
Early attempts at differentiating the various disorders by imaging utilized
pneumoencephalography to search for unique anatomic changes. The subtle
alterations in anatomy were difficult to appreciate with what is considered
by today’s standards a crude tool. The introduction of computed tomography
(CT) brought with it a flurry of reports on the subtle anatomic changes,
primarily related to specific patterns of atrophy, associated with the
various movement disorders. With the advent of magnetic resonance imaging (MR),
the neuroimaging of patients with movement disorders was revolutionized.
Magnetic resonance images are affected by the presence of small amounts of
naturally occurring paramagnetic substances — primarily iron — which
delineate the neostriatum (caudate and putamen), globus pallidus, red
nucleus, substantia nigra, and dentate nucleus.1 These paramagnetic
substances are made apparent by the T2* effect. Contrast is created by local
inhomogeneities in the magnetic field, which cause spin dephasing, and
subsequent signal void (Koenig). This effect is best appreciated with
gradient echo sequences, but is readily apparent on conventional spin echo
T2 weighted sequences. The area of relative decreased signal on T2 weighted
images roughly correspond to the distribution of ferric iron demonstrated by
Perls’ Prussian blue stain.2 (Figure 1) There is a characteristic
distribution of brain iron that varies with age; none is present at birth,
then a rapid accumulation occurs with the majority being present between the
ages of 8 and 25 years. After this, gradual accumulation occurs,
predominantly in the globus pallidus, putamen, and substantia nigra in old
age. A unique characteristic of the extrapyramidal system is that its nuclei
contain high concentrations of iron, particularly globus pallidus and
substantia nigra. Lesser amounts are found in the red nucleus, dentate
nucleus, nigrostriatal tract, putamen, caudate nucleus, and the fifth layer
of cortical gray matter. The reasons for increased iron in nuclei related to
movement are unknown.
Figure 1 Missing
Magnetic resonance imaging’s accurate portrayal of neuroanatomy allows for
detection of subtle changes in brain volume, which may reflect atrophy. The
evaluation of brain iron also provides an important tool for evaluating and
diagnosing patients with movement disorders. Additional functional imaging
tools, such as radionuclide cisternography, single photon emission computed
tomography (SPECT), and magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) may also play
an important role. Stereotactic MR provides accurate localization for
targeted therapy in select patients.
Neuroimaging in Parkinson’s Disease and Parkinsonism. The heterogeneous
group of akinetic-rigid syndromes includes Parkinson’s Disease, secondary
parkinsonisms, and parkinsonisms with other heterogeneous system disorders
of Parkinson plus syndrome. This third group contains several diseases
including progressive supranuclear palsy, olivo-ponto-cerebellar atrophy,
Shy-Drager syndrome and striatonigral degeneration. Differentiating these
entities with MR can be difficult, but the MR exam can provide clues. In
Parkinson’s Disease, there is a relatively inconstant finding of increased
signal within the dorsal lateral aspect of the substantia nigra (pars
compacta) on T2 weighted images. The normal low signal seen in this region
due to iron deposition is reversed and similar to signal in the adjacent
brainstem. This finding is relatively specific to parkinsonisms, but does
not differentiate Parkinson’s Disease from parkinsonisms secondary to
other causes, such as infection, toxin- or drug-induced trauma or
infarction. There is however an excellent correlation with parkinsonism
secondary to stroke. These patients will show ischemic signal change,
typically at the level of the decussation of the brachium conjunctivum or
upper pons. In patients with Parkinson’s plus syndrome, both iron
distribution and pattern of focal atrophy can provide clues. Patients with
progressive supranuclear palsy show a fairly typical pattern of midbrain
atrophy, with concurrent dilatation of the aqueduct, quadrigeminal plate
cistern, and posterior portion of the third striatonigial degeneration
ventricle (Rutledge). Patients with olivo-ponto-cerebellar atrophy and Shy-Drager
syndrome show atrophy of the pons, olives, brachium pontis, medulla, and
cerebellum. Patients with these multi system atrophy syndromes will often
have increased signal within the globus pallidus and posterior putamen. In
all of the Parkinson’s plus syndromes there is often decrease in signal in
the putamen due to increased iron deposition relative to the normal
decreased signal in the adjacent globus pallidus. In these patients there
may also be decreased signal in the pars compacta of substantia nigra.3
Although the imaging findings in the parkinsonisms are not entirely
specific, they can detect patients who may not benefit from conventional
anti-parkinsonism therapy, such as patients with Parkinson’s plus
syndromes.
Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus. Normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) has
classically been described by the clinical trial of gait disturbance,
dementia, and urinary incontinence. Not all elderly patients with gait
disturbance due to NPH display the complete triad. The initial screening
exam is usually a cranial CT, showing disproportionate enlargement of
ventricles relative to cortical sulcal dilatation. This initial exam will
also exclude many other causes, such as frontal lobe tumors. In patients
with enlarged ventricles by CT, and no other concomitant findings, the
subsequent diagnostic paradigm remains controversial. Most would agree that
MR examination is useful to exclude other subtle causes, such as ischemic
injury, ie, Binswanger’s disease. If the MR fails to yield an alternative
underlying diagnosis, and further confirms the suspicion of NPH by
demonstrating normal or augmented flow through the aqueduct and/or no
obstructive ventricular lesion, the next potential confirmatory diagnostic
exam is radionuclide cisternography. Although not entirely specific,
demonstration of the typical flow pattern seen with NPH
will often help confirm the diagnosis. After ventricular shunting is
performed, CT is useful for excluding complications of the procedure, such
as formation of subdural hygromas or hematomas. The size of the ventricular
system demonstrated by post-shunting cranial CT shows an imperfect
correlation with clinical improvement. Nuclear medicine studies have not
been predictive of response to shunting.
Neuroimaging of Patients with Dystonia. Neuroimaging provides little
specificity in the primary or inherited dystonias. There is however a fairly
good correlation between MR characteristics and cause of secondary dystonias.
A good example is Wilson’s disease, where abnormal deposition of copper
results in a characteristic pattern of decreased signal in the putamen.
Patients with Hallervorden-Spatz disease will show a typical pattern of
abnormal decreased signal within the globus pallidus due to abnormal iron
deposition, despite the pathologic features
of pallidal gliosis, demyelination and axonal loss, features which usually
cause increased
T2 signal. In other secondary causes of dystonia, such as Leigh’s disease,
glutaric aciduria, post-infection, or post-ischemic dystonia, neuroimaging
will often provide confirmatory diagnosis due to specific localization of an
anatomic lesion within the extrapyramidal system.
Neuroimaging in Choreic Disorders and Hemiballismus. The prototypic choreic
disorder is Huntington’s disease. Recent advances in genetic detection of
this disorder have made MR imaging less useful. Patients with Huntington’s
disease show early MR findings of increased signal within the caudate
nucleus, followed by progressive loss of volume with resulting lateral
dilatation of the frontal horns of the lateral ventricles. Magnetic
resonance spectroscopy is currently being investigated as an additional tool
for detection and monitoring disease progress.
Hemiballismus is a rare disorder and is almost always caused by a lesion
near the contralateral subthalamic nucleus although multiple sub-cortical
structures may be involved. These lesions may be neoplastic, ischemic or
hemorrhagic. The sensitivity of MR imaging will provide confirmatory
localization of the lesion in almost all cases, and the specificity of MR
and MRS will often provide the specific diagnosis.
Conclusion. Currently available neuroimaging techniques allow clinicians to
diagnose movement disorders accurately. At CNI, the most important uses of
MRI include evaluation of secondary causes of movement disorders and as an
aid in stereotactic surgery. Development of functional imaging techniques
and metabolic imaging using SPECT scans and new labeled isotopes will lead
CNI into the future with cutting edge technology.
|
References
1. Rutledge JN, Hilal SK, Silver AJ, et al. Study of Movement Disorders and
Brain Iron by MR. AJR. August 1997;149:
365-379.
2. Drayer B, Burger P, Darwin R, et al. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Brain
Iron. AJNR. 1986;7:373-380.
3. Drayer BP, Olanow W, Burger P, et al. Parkinson Plus Syndrome: Diagnosis
Using High Field MR Imaging of Brain Iron. Radiology. 1986;159:493-598.
|
|