|
An approach to psychophysiological insomnia for the clinician is
described with suggestions for diagnosing and treating sleep complaints with
greater sophistication and precision. The epidemiology of insomnia and the
role of comorbid psychological/psychiatric conditions are discussed.
Finally, guidelines for appropriate referral of insomnia patients to sleep
centers are presented in the context of a description of specialized
behavioral treatments offered in such settings.
Introduction. On a list of quintessential maladies for our age,
fatigue and insomnia would undoubtedly occupy prominent positions. Of the
two, insomnia might be considered the most insidious and unfair, coming upon
us as it does during one of our most vulnerable, private, and needed times.
Insomnia is blamed by our patients for their forgetfulness and imprecise
thinking, for their irritability and exhaustion, for their nervousness, and
for troubles at home, school and work. It is sometimes not a simple thing to
diagnose and treat; nevertheless, a better understanding of disorders of
sleeplessness can help practitioners assist a majority of their insomniac
patients. This article will address some of the current thinking in the
sleep community about insomnia in adults, and offer an approach for the
clinician with regard to first-line non-pharmacologic therapy.
Epidemiology. While estimates of incidence and prevalence must be
extrapolated, insomnia undoubtedly constitutes a major on-going health
problem in the United States. Various surveys estimate the incidence for
complaints of insomnia at around 35% of the adult population each year, and
another 3% to 10% or so appear to suffer from chronic insomnia. Between
one-fifth and one-third of medical outpatients struggle significantly with
sleepiness during the course of their illness.1 As age increases, so do
complaints of sleep disruption. More than
one-quarter of individuals over the age of 65 are affected. Aging changes
the nature of the problem as well, while younger insomniacs complain more
often of sleep induction difficulties, sleep-maintenance problems
predominate in older adults. Finally, women complain more than twice as
often as men of disturbed sleep.
One study estimated the total direct cost of treating American insomniacs in
1995 alone to be around $14 000 000.2
An IMS National Prescription Audit in that year suggested that the annual
costs of sedative-hypnotics in America ran above
$1 billion. The total US consumption
of sedative-hypnotics was found sufficient to supply a dose every night of
the year to two million Americans.3 Indeed, the survey noted that nearly 1%
of the population may take hypnotics virtually every night. Moreover, it is
well-known that protracted withdrawal of benzodiazepines may be expected in
10% to 25% of chronic users, and may persist for many months.
Diagnosis. The International Classification of Sleep Disorders considers 3
types of problems under the rubric of “primary insomnias:”
Psychophysiological Insomnia, which is a “disorder of somatized tension
and learned sleep-preventing associations...”, Idiopathic Insomnia, “a
lifelong inability to obtain adequate sleep” presumed due to an
abnormality of neurological control, and Sleep State Misperception, a disorder in which complaint of insomnia occurs
in the absence
of objective evidence of sleep disturbance.
The focus in this article will be on the first of these conditions.
Within these larger categories, sleep-onset insomnia implies that
sleep-onset latency after lights-out is regularly longer than 30 minutes.
Sleep-maintenance insomnia is diagnosed when time awake after sleep is
achieved totals more than 30 minutes during the night, or when a person
experiences unwanted early morning awakening after fewer than 6.5 hours of
sleep. Both conditions can obviously co-exist in the same patient at the
same time.
Duration of insomnia also has significant etiological and therapeutic
implications. Transient insomnia, for example, has been defined as that
lasting several days. Short-term insomnia has a duration of 1-to-3 weeks,
while chronic insomnia may be considered acute (less than 1 month), subacute
(1-to-6 months), or chronic (greater than 6 months). The sleep disorders
specialist is likely to approach each of these with somewhat different
therapeutic parameters in mind.
Perhaps most important to remember
at all times when analyzing patient complaints of disturbed sleep is that
insomnia is nearly always a symptom, not a disease.4 Concomitant psychiatric
disorders are often seen in patients with complaints of insomnia, and
indeed, the diagnosis of a primary sleep disorder is not made when persons
can be diagnosed with a generalized anxiety syndrome, major depressive
disorders, and various other DSM-IV psychopathologic conditions. Therefore,
it becomes important for clinicians to do more than inquire about
depression, the presence or absence of panic attacks, or about “stress”
in superficial ways. Knowing your patients, their life circumstances, sleep
habits and history, psychological vulnerabilities and the like is necessary
before precise diagnosis and focused, effective treatment can be made. Table
1 highlights a set of important review issues around which to organize an
initial insomnia examination.
Table 1. Concerns to review in the clinical
investigation of insomnia
-
Rule out medical etiology. (eg, neurologic, rheumatologic,
hepatic encephalopathy)
-
Assess stressors and stress response/reactivity
-
Assess substance use (eg, fluid intake, ETOH, prescriptions,
caffeine, tobacco, herbs, etc.)
-
Assess environment (eg, bedroom temperature, noise,
comfort, partner issues, etc.)
-
Assess conditioned response re: cognitive arousal
-
Assess lifestyle factors (eg, exercise routine, naps,
sleep schedule, snoring, food intake)
|
In addition to these clinical queries, standard diagnostic sleep practice
involves employing a nightly sleep diary, to be filled out by patients for a
period of at least several weeks. Various diary schemes are employed to
different purposes across settings, but in general, a sleep diary should
employ a simple-to-use format, and allow the patient to record the following
every night: bedtime, time of arising, latency to sleep onset, number and
duration of nocturnal awakenings, time of last awakening, daytime naps,
medication and substance use (with time taken), as well as some sort of
subjective assessment of sleep quality. After the patient has completed such
a diary for a few weeks, the practitioner has an opportunity to analyze the
sleep disturbance qualitatively, as well as to compute the patient’s sleep
efficiency (SE). The latter is done by dividing actual time asleep by total
time in bed. Current clinical convention suggests that SE less than 85% is
useful for a formal diagnosis of insomnia. (It is extremely unusual for even
significantly affected primary insomniacs to experience symptoms every
single night. When the complaint is of unremitting insomnia, this is often a
clue for consideration that psychological, psychiatric or medical etiologies
may well be primary.)
Sleep Disturbance and Psychopathology. Complicating the diagnosis and
treatment of insomnia is the significant, well-recognized comorbidity of
psychological and psychiatric conditions. Research suggests about one-third
of all patients who complain of sleep problems suffer from a concurrent
diagnosable psychiatric disorder.5 Even in individuals who do not meet
diagnostic psychiatric criteria, studies have found that as many as 77% of
patients with a first diagnosis of primary insomnia also suffer from a
psychological condition which experts rate as “significantly contributing”
to the sleep problem.6 Finally, it is well-known that 50% to 80% of
psychiatric patients complain of sleep disturbance during the acute phase of
a mental disorder. When the deleterious effect of substance use or abuse (eg,
caffeine and alcohol) on sleep is considered as well, the importance of
solid screening and the need at times to refer patients for more detailed
psychological evaluation becomes clear.
While a comprehensive review of psychopathology and sleep is beyond the
scope of this article, the non-mental health practitioner should keep in
mind a few basic issues when evaluating patients with complaints of
insomnia. Screening for mood and anxiety disorders is actually most
efficiently accomplished in a limited time by asking a few open-ended
questions, as opposed to “Are you depressed these days?” (which
frequently means different things to different people), or “Do you ever
panic?” Similarly, rather than asking, “Are you under a lot of stress?”
the practitioner is encouraged to “normalize” stress as a ubiquitous
phenomenon and therefore elicit more accurate life portrayals from patients
who may otherwise fear being pathologized: “What are the stresses you are
struggling most with these days?” gets the job done more effectively. In
fact, hassles may be more of a contributing factor in chronic
psychophysiological conditions than major life stressors are.
When asking about substance use, clinical practice has suggested phrasing
questions in a naively presumptive fashion rather than “Do you drink
alcohol?” or “How much do you drink?” For example, more productive
initial approach nearly always seems to be, “Do you drink more than 8
drinks per night on a regular basis?” Finally, when querying about onset
of duration of the disorder, encourage patients to look for initial
precipitating stressors that may have been incompletely managed or continue
to exert their effects. Morin comments that psychological stress is the most
common precipitant of insomnia, and that nearly three-fourths of patients
will be able to recall a specific precipitating stressor that heralded the
onset of their condition.7 This assessment can be invaluable in guiding
care.
Treatment. Psychophysiological insomnia is the most common of the insomnias,
and many sleep specialists view such patients as maintaining a state of
chronically increased cognitive hyperarousal, which then feeds back into or
results in psychophysioloigc hyperarousal. Common signs of such a state are
indicated in Table 2. Sometimes all that is required is reassurance by the
practitioner that loss of sleep is almost never dangerous or serious from a
medical standpoint in and of itself, that in most cases sleep can be
improved if not returned to normal by attending carefully to good sleep
hygiene,7 that going without a good night’s sleep from time-to-time is
normal, especially under conditions of chronic or acute stress, and that
lost sleep does not need to be completely made up.
Table 2. Indications of cognitive hyperarousal
-
Panic or catastrophizing about insomnia.
-
Frequent daytime thoughts and worries about insomnia and sleep.
-
Belief that everything would be better in my life if sleep changes.
-
Belief that all lost sleep needs to be made up.
-
Trying too hard to fall asleep.
-
General tendency to worry, ruminate, be hypervigilant, etc.
|
However, when sleep complaints persist despite initial treatment efforts,
and/or if certain other conditions exist, referral to a sleep disorders
specialist, program, or center may be indicated (see Table 3). Psychological
and behavioral therapies produce reliable and durable improvements of sleep
pattern in between 60% to 80% of patients with both chronic and primary
insomnias.
Table 3. When to refer to sleep specialist:
Insomnia
-
If no noticeable improvement occurs in symptoms after 1 month office
treatment.
-
If comorbid psychiatric or substance use disorder is present.
-
If significant sleep myths and misconceptions are present and appear to
contribute to a cycle of cognitive hyperarousal.
-
If maladaptive conditioned (arousal) responses are present.
-
If significant cognitive, attentional, communicative, sensory,
perceptual, or amnestic problems are described as being related to the sleep
disorder.
|
Several specialized behavioral and psychological techniques, usually
instituted in tandem with a short-term, focused form of cognitive-behavioral
psychotherapy aimed at addressing sleep myths and misconceptions, may be
employed by the sleep specialist. While psychophysiological arousal is
common among insomniacs, it is frequently secondary to chronic cognitive
hyperarousal or hyperactivation. The later is typically multifactorial, with
variables like baseline autonomic reactivity, life pressures, general
cognitive style, characterological tendencies (eg, toward obsessiveness,
histrionic, or pessimistic bent), all playing a role in the process. For
this reason, intervention with psychophysiological therapies like hypnosis,
neuromuscular relaxation, and meditation, all of which engender a
psychophysiological relaxation response and decrease sympathetic nervous
system overactivity, is usually but one important aspect of the
comprehensive treatment of such patients. However, techniques alone only
rarely suffice to return patients to normal sleep patterns. While it is
theoretically possible to learn to utilize these in the primary care
setting, these techniques appear to be most beneficial when applied in a
program that also evaluates and addresses potentially subtler, interwoven
psychological and personality issues (eg, conditioned responses), as well as
the interaction among these and broader life-style factors.
Most often, patients require in-depth analysis of sleep habits and hygiene,
and suggestions for modifying the specific psychological, behavioral, and
lifestyle factors that seem to be contributing in each particular case to
the insomnia. In addition, reassurance and education about particular “sleep
myths or misconceptions” that may be contributing to irrational worry and
excessive cognitive activation often need to be addressed. Finally, where
needed and useful, specialized behavioral sleep disorder interventions will
be adapted and prescribed for the patient, depending upon presenting
complaints and issues. These include, for example, sleep restriction
therapy, which involves limiting (sometimes dramatically) the amount of time
spent in bed, technically monitoring sleep efficiency closely over time, and
then gradually increasing time in bed as sleep efficiency increases until
desired optimum sleep duration is achieved.
Similarly, stimulus control techniques will be utilized if insomnia appears
to be the result of problematic conditioning of associations between
environmental (bed-and-bedroom) or nocturnal factors with behaviors
incompatible with sleep. Important to note, recent research suggests that
use of sedative-hypnotics be deferred while behavioral treatment for sleep
problems is implemented, despite patients’ wishes for a “quick fix.”
The use of such agents may actually interfere with ultimate sleep goals and
patient progress.8
Conclusion. Patients with complaints of insomnia, of course, need an initial
solid medical work-up as part of any approach to the sleep disturbance.
Second, testing the waters about comorbid or contributing psychological
issues or disorders is crucial, and referral for more in-depth
psychodiagnostic work-up may be indicated in a fair proportion of cases, as
the statistics cited above suggest. Such referral can be made on sleep
grounds
per se, and be directed to a sleep specialist or health psychologist, so as
to minimize the patient’s worry that the referring doctor thinks the
problem is “...all in my head...”, or that “I’m crazy.” Careful,
subtle review of a wide variety of substance issues, including prescribed
medication, keeping in mind that 10% to 15% of insomnia patients have
substance abuse problems, should be undertaken.9 Review of the patient’s
sleep habits and basic principles of sleep hygiene is almost always
indicated. In some instances the problem can actually be solved right there.
Should basic office care not suffice and amelioration of major symptoms not
be noted in a month or so, referral to a sleep disorders program or
specialist may be the most efficient and cost-effective way of providing
your patients with optimal, maximum, and lasting symptomatic relief.
|
References
1. Blais F. Prevalence of insomnia in outpatient medical
clinics. Poster presented at the Associated Professional Sleep
Societies 12th Annual Meeting. New Orleans, LA;
June 1998.
2. Walsh JK, Englehart CL. The direct economic costs of insomnia in
the United States: 1995. Poster presented at the Associated
Professional Sleep Societies 12th Annual Meeting.
New Orleans, LA;June 1998.
3. Kripke DF. US consumption of hypnotics: Do we know? Poster
presented at the Associated Professional Sleep Societies 12th Annual
Meeting. New Orleans, LA; June 1998.
4. Zorick F. Insomnia. In: Meir H, Kryger, et al, eds. Principles
and practice of sleep medicine. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 1994.
5. Morin CM, Ware, JC. Sleep and psychopathology. Applied and
Preventative Psychology. 1996;Fall 5(4):211-224.
6. Nowell P. Clinical factors contributing to the differential
diagnosis of primary insomnia and insomnia related to mental
disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry. 1997;154(10):1412-1416.
7. Morin CM. Insomnia. New York, NY: Guiliford Press;1993.
8. Morin CM, Wooten V. Psychological and pharmacological approaches
to treating insomnia: Critical issues is assessing their separate
and combined effects. Clinical Psychology Review.
1996;16(6):521-542.
9. Houri PJ. Can we mix behavioral therapy with hypnotic when
treating insomnia? Sleep. 1997;20(12):1111-1118.
|
|