|
The key issue in treating insomnia is to diagnose the specific medical
condition or underlying issue that is creating the symptom of insomnia.
Indiscriminate use of the classic sleeping pills is to be avoided. In this
article we will discuss the use of the newer sleep promoting agents.
Controversies regarding chronic use will also be discussed. Recent insights
into the use of melatonin and antidepressants as treatment for chronic
insomnia will be highlighted. As with any pharmacotherapeutic agent, patient
selection and close follow-up is needed when prescribing these agents.
Introduction. Thomas Edison, unknowingly, created one of the largest
business segments in the United States. It was not his impact on the
electrical industry, but on expenditures for sleep products. His discovery
has resulted in more shift workers, a societal phase delay in our sleep
patterns, and chronic sleep deprivation in many. In 1990, Americans spent
over $78 000 000 on over-the-counter sleep preparations.1 Physicians in 1992
wrote over 17 000 000 prescriptions to promote better sleep.2
The pharmacotherapy for insomnia began in the 1860’s with chloral hydrate.
This was followed by bromide in 1870. In 1960, the modern era of therapy
began with benzodiazepine sedative hypnotics. The earlier sedatives and
barbiturates are now all but abandoned.3 The use of sleeping agents goes up
with patient’s age. This parallels the complaint of insomnia in the
elderly. Other sleep disorders increase in the elderly and treating the
primary sleep disorder, as opposed to the symptom of insomnia, is indicated.
At the recent American Sleep Disorders Association (ASDA) meeting in New
Orleans (1998), much debate was centered on the nosology of insomnia. It is
felt that the term insomnia is too vague for medical usage. Another lexicon
is needed to communicate more effectively the medical condition and its
implications. For now, the treating physician is to remember that insomnia
is only a symptom. The pharmacotherapy of this complaint can be done at the
level of pure symptomatic management or it can be done at the level of
specific diagnosis and treatment. Each approach may be correct when
knowingly applied in each individual patient.
Melatonin. The properties of an ideal sedative hypnotic are listed in Table
1. Melatonin has had its proponents that it fits this profile. It indeed is
a powerful physiological agent whose long-term effects and adverse reactions
remain unknown. As the “tryptophan-myositis” experience has taught us,
we need to be extremely cautious when using any molecule, even if on the
surface, it appears to be safe.
Table 1. The ideal sedative hypnotic. Is melatonin the answer?
|
Property
|
Theoretical Ideal
|
Melatonin
|
Onset of Action
|
Rapid
|
Intermediate
|
Residual Sedation
|
None
|
Rare
|
Tolerance
|
None
|
Probably Not
|
Rebound Insomnia
|
None
|
Unknown
|
Dependence
|
None
|
Unknown
|
Acute Adverse Effects
|
None
|
Probably Not
|
Chronic Adverse Effects
|
None
|
Unknown
|
Duration of Action
|
All Night
|
Not with Present Formulations
|
Melatonin is synthesized in the pineal gland.4 The pineal gland is located
in the center of the brain just posterior to the third ventricle. Melatonin
is synthesized from tryptophan via a serotonin intermediary. The pineal glad
synthesizes melatonin in response to changes in light. It can be thought of
as a chemo-photo-transducer in this regard. When light hits the retina, it
activates the suprachiasmatic nucleus of the hypothalamus. This then sends a
noradrenergic signal, via the sympathetic nervous system, to the pineal
gland which responds by the synthesis of melatonin. Melatonin synthesis
begins with decrease in the photo-input to the gland. The dim light
melatonin onset (DLMO) is a standard marker for circadian patterns in
humans. Onset and production of melatonin is sustained throughout the night.
It peaks from 2:00 AM to 4:00 AM and decreases slowly in the morning. Newer
melatonin preparations for treatment of sleep disorders may focus on
creating this physiologic profile of release.
The concentration of the agent reaches
a maximum of approximately 60 picogram/ml (pg/ml) in the dark. During the
day it is sustained at 10 pg/ml. An office fluorescent light is enough to
inhibit melatonin production to daytime levels and this may be one of
several mechanisms that creates problems for night shift workers.4 Melatonin
does not appear to be synthesized until the third month of life. The timing
of its synthesis with myelination of the central nervous system correlates
well with the development of sleep/wake patterns in babies. Melatonin is
hydroxylated in the liver and excreted in the urine after conjugation as
6-sulfatoxymelatonin.
Oral doses given in clinical studies or in over-the-counter preparations are
usually 1 to 5 mg. This results in a Cmax of approximately 50 times the
sustained release level. The Tmax for such preparations is one hour. Return
to baseline is 4 to 8 hours. This profile does not mimic, at this time, the
physiologic sustained response of the gland.4, 5
Physiologic effects of melatonin are mediated through second messengers.
Melatonin receptors work primarily through G-proteins. There are also
intracytoplasmic and nuclear receptors. It appears that its hypnotic effect
is independent of its circadian effect. Its circadian effect leads to
lowering of body temperature which promotes sleep. However, its hypnotic
effects can occur independent of any thermal effects. Decreased sleep
latency, increased sleep efficiency, increased REM percentages, can all
occur in a dose dependent fashion.4, 5
The clinical and systemic effects of melatonin are many. It is a free
radical scavenger and an immune activator. These two properties have led to
its label as an “anti-aging” medication. It has been promoted as an
agent to enhance sexual behavior. This is curious since it, paradoxically,
is an inhibitor of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadol axis.
It has been found to shift the endogenous circadian phase.6 This has led to
its use clinically in disorders such as jet lag and the disorder of shift
work. Doses used in many of these studies are 5 to 10 mg. One open-label
study from Italy tested 14 physicians attending a conference in Hong Kong.7
They were dosed with 5 mg the day of departure and for 2 days upon arrival
in Hong Kong. All subjects had a positive response. A study of 52
international cabin crew members compared 5 mg versus a placebo and found
less residual sleepiness and faster recovery times to the new time zone in
treated subjects.8 Nurses given 0.5 mg on a rotating shift had better mood
and performance versus placebo. Other studies have reproduced these results.
Doses are usually given 30 minutes prior to or at bedtime.
Melatonin has a role in transient (days-months) circadian disorders, as well
as transient insomnia. Its role as a chronic, therapeutic agent is unknown.
It may be safer in the elderly where it might be a replacement therapy.
Patients with chronic exposure may be running the risk of developing
withdrawal states or abnormal suppressive effects from taking this exogenous
hormone.
Sedative hypnotics. The modern age of pharmacotherapy began in the 1960’s
with the introduction of flurazepam.2 Since that time there has been the
development of 4 other benzodiazepine hypnotics and one nonbenzodiazepine
hypnotic (Table 2). The benzodiazepine hypnotics work primarily by binding
to GabaA receptors. These are diffusely located throughout the nervous
system. The effects are felt to be mediated primarily by postsynaptic
receptors. Activation of these receptors increase chloride influx resulting
in hyperpolarization of neurons. Zolpidem (Ambien) appears to be more
specific in terms of its Gaba receptor physiology. Benzodiazepines bind
nonspecifically to all 3 subclasses of the receptor, whereas zolpidem binds
specifically to one subclass.
The polysomnographic effects of the benzodiazepines include decrease in slow
wave sleep.9 There does not appear to be any change in the REM sleep. They
clearly can exacerbate pre-existing sleep apnea and it is debated whether
they can induce new apnea in at risk patients. Barbiturates and most
antidepressants on the other hand, suppress REM sleep. Ethanol suppresses
many aspects of normal sleep physiology and can exacerbate sleep apnea.
The key pharmacokinetic parameters of the major hypnotics are summarized in
Table 2. Onset of action is fairly consistent across the agents. Patients
should be instructed to not delay sleep onset after taking these agents.
Patients who remain up and active, especially the elderly, are more prone to
develop injury or cognitive dysfunction prior to falling asleep. The
clinical duration of action should be kept in mind depending on whether one
is trying to promote sleep onset, sleep maintenance, or suppress early
awakenings. The elimination of half-life of the agents and their metabolites
usually extends for prolonged periods of time after the clinical effect is
seen. This may be responsible for some of the problems of these agents. The
main side effects of the hypnotics include residual sedation, anterograde
amnesia, and rebound insomnia.10
Table 2. Kinetic parameters of hypnotics |
Drug
|
Onset (min)
|
Clinical Duration (hr)
|
Elimination T 1/2 (hr)
|
Estrazolam (ProSom)
|
15-30
|
6-8
|
16
|
Flurazepam (Dalmane)
|
15-30
|
8-10
|
65
|
Quazepam (Doral)
|
15-30
|
8-10
|
30
|
Temazepam (Restoril)
|
45-60
|
6-8
|
14
|
Triazolam (Halcion)
|
15-30
|
3-4
|
4
|
Zolpidem (Ambien)
|
15-30
|
3-4
|
3
|
General guidelines for prescribing hypnotics
Establish the specific diagnosis of sleep disorders based on the
International Classification of Sleep Disorders (ICSD).
Treat any other underlying medical and sleep disorders not requiring
hypnotics.
Institute appropriate sleep hygiene and behavioral therapies.
Access efficacy with ongoing scheduled clinic visits.
Monitor the common side effects/abuse potential.
Risk groups include elderly, polypharmacy, and institutionalized
patients.
Consider withdrawal of these agents once a sustained therapeutic end
point is accomplished (3, 6, 12 months).
|
Residual sedation clearly is a function
of dose and increasing half-life. High doses of short half-life agents can
indeed produce residual sedation. There is less of this with the
benzodiazepines than the older barbiturates. Residual sedation can continue
despite behavioral tolerance that may develop. Anterograde amnesia can be
seen with any sedative hypnotic, both benzodiazepine and nonbenzodiazepine.
The amnesia is felt to be a function of sleep onset latency. If wakeful
activity continues after pharmacologic onset, then behavioral amnesia will
develop. It has been argued that anterograde amnesia from these agents may
really represent retrograde amnesia due to acute sleep onset. Rebound
insomnia is described as 1 to 2 nights of poor sleep after acute
discontinuation. It is characterized by a delay in sleep onset and poor
sleep efficiency.10 It has been described in all sedative hypnotics, both
short and intermediate acting. It may be also directly a function of dose.
Duration of treatment may also contribute to rebound insomnia. Zolpidem
appears to have an advantage in that testing of this agent over 6 to 8 weeks
did not result in as much rebound insomnia as other agents.11 However, these
major side effects have not been properly assessed in dose equivalent,
head-to-head comparisons among agents.
Antidepressants. Classic teaching states that depression and REM sleep are
intimately tied. There appears to be decreased REM latency in those who are
depressed. This may be due to increased REM pressure or a circadian shift.
Antidepressants are, for the most part, REM suppressants. Acute REM sleep
deprivation in sleep lab environments can decrease depressive symptomatology.
Such a therapeutic approach has its limitations. With the advent of new
psychopharmacology, this relationship with REM does not appear to be
absolute. For example, bupropion (Wellbutrin) and nefazodone (Serzone) may
not change, or may actually increase, REM sleep on polysomnography.12
The mechanism of improved sleep is related to the antidepressants’ ability
to block adrenergic and serotonergic transmission. Blocking noradrenergic
transmission appears to be very critical in regulating polysomnographic
findings and in normalizing REM/nonREM interactions.12, 13 Although
antidepressants are not approved for use solely for “insomnia,” they are
extensively prescribed and have good clinical efficacy for sleep
disorder patients. Antidepressant effects on sleep and polysomnography have
not been directly compared in an appropriate study.
Nevertheless, sleep complaints, primarily insomnia, are commonly seen in
association with other depressive symptoms or as co-morbidities. They can
clearly cause a positive feedback loop. There is usually a delay in the
direct antidepressant effects of these medications. Sedating effects may be
perceived immediately by the patient prior to direct antidepressant effects.
Drugs with such sedating effects may be more helpful in the management of
patients presenting primarily with sleep symptomatology (Table 3).
Table 3. Antidepressant agents for sleep.
|
SEDATING
|
INTERMEDIATE
|
ALERTING
|
Amitriptyline
|
Imipramine
|
Desipramine (Norpramin)
|
Doxepine (Sinequan)
|
Nortriptyline
|
Protriptyline (Vivactil)
|
Trimipramine (Surmontil)
|
Amoxapine (Asendin)
|
Bupropion (Wellbutrin)
|
Trazodone (Desyrel)
|
Paroxetine (Paxil)
|
Fluoxetine (Prozac)
|
Mirtazapine (Remeron)
|
Sertralione (Zoloft)
|
|
|
|
Venlafaxine (Effexor)
|
|
|
|
Nefazodone (Serzone)
|
|
The use of antidepressant medications requires appropriate knowledge of
their side effects.13, 14 This is particularly true in the elderly.
Cardiovascular disease is an important risk factor, especially when using
the tricyclics. Anticholinergic side effects can include exacerbation of
urinary retention, orthostatic hypotension, and arrhythmias. Rarely,
antidepressants can precipitate periodic limb movements which can
paradoxically exacerbate insomnia.
Many of the over-the-counter preparations for insomnia contain
antihistamines. Major components include hydroxyzine and diphenhydramine.
These also can have anticholinergic side effects and result in residual
sedation. The use of such over-the-counter medications should be discouraged
in patients who are actively undergoing treatment — be it with
nonpharmacologic therapies, pharmacologic therapies, or both.
Conclusion. Both acute and short-term use and chronic long-term use, may be
appropriate for sleep-promoting agents in any one patient. This holds true
for melatonin, antidepressants, and certain sedative-hypnotic agents. It is
important that appropriate patient selection be made. Diagnosing underlying
medical and sleep disorders contributing to insomnia are crucial. All
patients with any sleep complaint need appropriate behavioral interventions
and sleep hygiene techniques.
|
References
1. National sleep foundation. Sleep in America. The Gallup Organization,
1991.
2. Nowell PD, Mazumdar S, Buysse DJ, et al. Benzodiazepines and zolpidem for
chronic insomnia. JAMA. 1997;278:2170-2177.
3. Pollack CP. Benzodiazepines for the treatment of sleep disorders.
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine.1988;57(suppl): S24-S30.
4. Brzezinski A. Malatonin in humans. NEJM. 1997;336(3):186-195.
5. Dawson D, Encel N. Melatonin and sleep in humans. J Pineal Res.
1993;15:1-12.
6. Lewy AJ, Ahmed S, Jackson JML, Sack RL. Melatonin shifts human circadian
rhythms according to the phase-response curve. Chronobiology international.
1992;9(5):380-392.
7. Lino A, Silvy S, Condorelli L, Rusconi AC. Melatonin and jet lag:
Treatment schedule. Biol Psychiatry. 1993;34:587.
8. Petrie K, Dawson AG, Thompson L, Brooks R. A double-blind trial of
melatonin as a treatment for jet lag in international cabin crew. Biol
Psychiatry. 1993;33:526-530.
9. Folks DG, Burke WJ. Sedative hypnotics and sleep. Clinics in Geriatric
Medicine. 1998;14(1):67-86.
10. Kales A. Benzodiazepine hypnotics and insomnia. Hospital Practice.
1990;25(suppl 3):7-21.
11. Ware JC, Walsh JK, Scharg MB, et al. Minimal rebound insomnia after
treatment with 10mg zolpidem. Clinical Neuropharacology. 1997;20(2):116-125.
12. Gillian JC, Rapaport M, Erman MK, et al. A comparison of nefazodone and
fluxetine on mood and on objective, subjective, and clinician-related
measures of sleep in depressed patients:
A double-blind, 8-week clinical trial. J Clin Psychiatry. 1997;58:185-192.
13. Ware JC. Profiles of antidepressants in promoting sleep.
J Clin Psychiatry. 1991;52:(suppl 6):57-61.
14. Mendelson WB. Clinical neuropharmacology of sleep. Neurologic Clinics.
1990;8(1):153-160.
|
|